Hive Challenges Non-Prosecution Decision Against Min Hee-jin

On July 15, 2025, Hive announced plans to file an objection with the prosecution regarding the non-prosecution decision against Min Hee-jin, the former CEO of ADOR. This move comes amidst a series of legal disputes involving serious allegations against Min Hee-jin, primarily concerning breach of duty and defamation.

Background of the Legal Disputes

The legal entanglements began in April 2024 when Hive reported Min Hee-jin to the Seoul Yongsan Police Station. The allegations were serious, with Hive claiming that Min was planning to seize control of ADOR, supported by evidence indicating a breach of her fiduciary duties. This report marked the start of a tumultuous period that would see Min Hee-jin fighting back against Hive’s claims.

Min Hee-jin’s Counteraction

In July 2024, Min Hee-jin retaliated by filing a lawsuit against five Hive executives. She accused them of obstructing her business and violating the Information and Communications Network Act, alleging defamation. This counteraction highlighted the intense corporate struggle and the personal stakes involved in this dispute.

Meanwhile, the Seoul High Court ruled that Min Hee-jin was intentionally undermining the integrated structure that supported her exclusive contract. This ruling added a layer of complexity to the ongoing legal battle, reinforcing Hive’s position that Min’s actions were detrimental to the company’s integrity.

Hive’s Strategy Moving Forward

As of July 15, 2025, Hive’s decision to file an objection signals their intention to pursue legal accountability vigorously. The company aims to challenge the prosecution’s initial decision not to pursue charges against Min Hee-jin, citing new evidence and developments in the case. This approach reflects Hive’s commitment to corporate governance and the need for transparency in high-stakes entertainment industry dealings.

Implications for the Entertainment Industry

The ongoing legal disputes not only impact Hive and Min Hee-jin but also carry broader implications for the entertainment industry. The issues of corporate governance, legal accountability, and defamation are at the forefront of this saga. As the case unfolds, it will undoubtedly attract significant media attention and public interest, highlighting the complexities of managing artist relationships and corporate responsibilities.

In conclusion, as Hive prepares to file its objection, the eyes of the industry remain focused on the developments surrounding Min Hee-jin and the legal ramifications of this high-profile case. The outcome will likely influence future corporate practices within the entertainment sector.

This article has been written by Kpopmap AI writer and while we have made efforts to ensure the accuracy of the article, there may be errors or inaccuracies.